IPM for fresh-market lettuce production in the desert southwest: the produce paradox
- 1 December 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Pest Management Science
- Vol. 65 (12), 1311-1320
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1864
Abstract
In the ‘Integrated Control Concept’, Stern et al. emphasized that, although insecticides are necessary for agricultural production, they should only be used as a last resort and as a complement to biological control. They argued that selective insecticide use should only be attempted after it has been determined that insect control with naturally occurring biotic agents is not capable of preventing economic damage. However, they concluded their seminal paper by emphasizing that integrated control will not work where natural enemies are inadequate or where economic thresholds are too low to rely on biological control. Thus, it is no surprise that insect control in high‐value, fresh‐market lettuce crops grown in the desert southwest have relied almost exclusively on insecticides to control a complex of mobile, polyphagous pests. Because lettuce and leafy greens are short‐season annual crops with little or no tolerance for insect damage or contamination, biological control is generally considered unacceptable. High expectations from consumers for aesthetically appealing produce free of pesticide residues further forces vegetable growers to use chemical control tactics that are not only effective but safe. Consequently, scientists have been developing integrated pest management (IPM) programs for lettuce that are aimed at reducing the economic, occupational and dietary risks associated with chemical controls of the past. Most of these programs have drawn upon the integrated control concept and promote the importance of understanding the agroecosystem, and the need to sample for pest status and use action thresholds for cost‐effective insect control. More recently, pest management programs have implemented newly developed, reduced‐risk chemistries that are selectively efficacious against key pests. This paper discusses the influence that the integrated control concept, relative to zero‐tolerance market standards and other constraints, has had on the adoption of pest management in desert lettuce crops. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical IndustryKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- EVALUATION OF SYNAPSE AND CORAGEN FOR CONTROL OF LEPIDOPTEROUS LARVAE ON FALL BROCCOL, 2007Arthropod Management Tests, 2008
- EVALUATION OF RADIANT AND RYNAXYPYR FOR CONTROL OF LEPIDOPTEROUS LARVAE ON FALL LETTUCE, 2006Arthropod Management Tests, 2007
- EVALUATION OF INTREPID FOR CONTROL OF LEPIDOPTEROUS LARVAE ON FALL LETTUCE, 2004Arthropod Management Tests, 2005
- Resistance of Field Strains of Beet Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Arizona and California to Carbamate InsecticidesJournal of Economic Entomology, 1998
- Safer and more effective insecticides for the futurePublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1997
- lmidacloprid Formulation and Soil Placement Effects on Colonization by Sweetpotato Whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae): Head Size and Incidence of Chlorosis in LettuceJournal of Economic Entomology, 1996
- Evaluation of Three Sampling Methods for Estimating Adult Sweet potato Whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) Abundance on CantaloupesJournal of Economic Entomology, 1995
- Composition, Seasonal Abundance, and Parasitism of Liriomyza (Diptera: Agromyzidae) Species on Lettuce in ArizonaJournal of Economic Entomology, 1994
- Yield Responses in Lettuce Plants at Various Density Treatment Levels of Lepidopterous LarvaeJournal of Economic Entomology, 1982
- The integration of chemical and biological control of the spotted alfalfa aphid: The integrated control conceptHilgardia, 1959