Performance of finishing pigs in hoop structures and confinement during winter and summer.
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Animal Science
- Vol. 81 (7), 1663-1670
- https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8171663x
Abstract
Performance of finishing pigs in hoop structures or confinement during winter and summer was evaluated in Iowa. Hoops are large, tent-like shelters with cornstalks or straw for bedding. During summer and winter seasons for 3 yr (1998 to 2001), six trials were conducted using three hoop barns (designed for 150 pigs per pen, one pen per hoop) or a mechanically ventilated confinement barn with slatted floors (designed for 22 pigs per pen, six pens in the barn). A total of 3,518 pigs started the trials. Summer trials were June through October, and winter trials were December through April. Target stocking density was 1.11 m2/pig in hoops and 0.74 m2/pig in confinement. Identical corn-based diets were fed ad libitum from 16 to 118 kg for 127 d. Pigs were scanned before harvest for backfat and loin muscle area. When seasons were merged (season × housing interaction, P ≥ 0.05), hoop-fed pigs had more backfat (21.8 ± 0.3 vs 20.8 ± 0.2 mm; P < 0.001), smaller loin muscle area (41.3 ± 0.3 vs 43.0 ± 0.2 cm2; P < 0.001), less lean percentage (51.1 ± 0.2 vs 52.1 ± 0.1%; P < 0.001), and less yield (74.9 vs 75.8 ± 0.1%; P < 0.001) than confinement-fed pigs. When season × housing type interactions were observed (P < 0.004), summer hoop-fed pigs had greater ADG (834 ± 5 vs 802 ± 3 g/d; P < 0.001), required fewer days to 113 kg (174.9 ± 0.9 vs 178.5 ± 0.6 d; P < 0.01), had similar ADFI (2.40 ± 0.03 vs 2.35 ± 0.02 kg/d, as-fed basis) and gain:feed (G:F; 348 ± 4 vs 342 ± 3 g/kg) compared with confinement-fed pigs. Lean gain/day and efficiency of lean gain did not differ between housing systems. During winter, hoop-fed pigs had similar ADG (794 ± 5 vs 801 ± 3 g/d), required more days to 113 kg (176.7 ± 0.9 vs 172.9 ± 0.6 d; P < 0.01), had greater ADFI (2.54 ± 0.03 vs 2.35 ± 0.02; P < 0.001), less G:F (313 ± 4 vs 341 ± 3; P < 0.001), less lean gain/day (312 ± 2 vs 322 ± 1 g/d; P < 0.01), and less efficiency of lean gain (130 ± 2 vs 144 ± 1 g lean gain/kg feed; P < 0.01) than confinement-fed pigs. Percentage of mortalities and culls did not differ between housing systems. During summer, there was a trend for fewer light pigs at marketing (< 100 kg) from hoops (0.8 vs 1.7%; P = 0.10). During winter, there were more light pigs at marketing from hoops (3.9 vs 1.3%; P = 0.01) than from confinement. Bedding use in hoops was 92 and 122 kg/pig for summer and winter, respectively. Performance of finishing pigs in bedded hoop structures depends in part on thermal environment.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alternative housing systems for pigs: Influences on growth, composition, and pork quality1Journal of Animal Science, 2002
- FEASIBILITY OF HOOP STRUCTURES FOR MARKET SWINE IN IOWA: PIG PERFORMANCE, PIG ENVIRONMENT, AND BUDGET ANALYSISApplied Engineering in Agriculture, 2001
- Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigsLivestock Production Science, 2000
- Hoop Housing for Feeder Pigs Offers a Welfare-Friendly Environment Compared to a Nonbedded Confinement SystemJournal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2000
- The effect of a fixed or free toy on the growth rate and aggressive behaviour of weaned pigs and the influence of hierarchy on initial investigation of the toysApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 1997
- Feedlot performance, carcass composition and meat quality of free-range reared pigsCanadian Journal of Animal Science, 1997
- Sustainability issues of U.S. swine production.Journal of Animal Science, 1996
- A note on the effect of deep-litter housing on growth performance of growing-finishing pigsCanadian Journal of Animal Science, 1993
- The effect of space restriction and provision of toys during rearing on the behaviour, productivity and physiology of male pigsApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 1993
- A note on the influence of rearing environment on meat quality in pigsMeat Science, 1983