A comparison of two direct-reading aerosol monitors with the federal reference method for PM2.5 in indoor air
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Atmospheric Environment
- Vol. 36 (1), 107-113
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00422-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Four Gravimetric Fine Particle Sampling MethodsJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2001
- Comparison of Real-Time Instruments Used To Monitor Airborne Particulate MatterJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2001
- Comparison of Short-Term Variations (15-Minute Averages) in Outdoor and Indoor PM2.5 ConcentrationsJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2000
- Characterization of indoor particle sources: A study conducted in the metropolitan Boston area.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2000
- Fine Particle (PM25) Measurement Methodology, Quality Assurance Procedures, and Pilot Results of the EXPOLIS StudyJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1999
- A case-crossover analysis of air pollution and mortality in Philadelphia.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1999
- Sampling Efficiency of the Tsi Aerodynamic Particle SizerInstrumentation Science & Technology, 1998
- Comparison of Respirable Samplers to Direct-Reading Real-Time Aerosol Monitors for Measuring Coal DustAihaj Journal, 1996
- Is Daily Mortality Associated Specifically with Fine Particles?Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1996
- Personal exposures to acidic aerosols and gasesEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1989