Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
- 1 October 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Gynecologic Oncology
- Vol. 127 (1), 11-17
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.031
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regionalization of Care for Obstetric Hemorrhage and Its Effect on Maternal MortalityObstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Robotic approach for cervical cancer: Comparison with laparotomy A case control studyGynecologic Oncology, 2009
- A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008
- Hospital Volume and Late Survival After Cancer SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Volume, Process of Care, and Operative Mortality for Cystectomy for Bladder CancerUrology, 2007
- Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancerThe Lancet, 1997
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- The frequency, causes and prevention of severe urinary dysfunction after radical hysterectomyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1983