Selective vs routine midline episiotomy for the prevention of third- or fourth-degree lacerations in nulliparous women
- 31 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 198 (3), 285.e1-285.e4
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes of Routine EpisiotomyJAMA, 2005
- Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: retrospective cohort studyBMJ, 2000
- Anal incontinence after anal sphincter disruption: A 30-year retrospective cohort studyPublished by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ,1997
- Is there a benefit to episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery? Observations over ten years in a stable populationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- Benefits and Risks of EpisiotomyObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1995
- Routine vs selective episiotomy: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 1993
- Benefits and Risks of EpisiotomyObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1983
- A COMPARISON BETWEEN MIDLINE AND MEDIOLATERAL EPISIOTOMIESBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1980