Providing feedback to hospital doctors about prescribing errors; a pilot study
- 20 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Pharmacy World & Science
- Vol. 29 (3), 213-220
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-006-9075-x
Abstract
Objective To assess the feasibility and acceptability of obtaining data on prescribing error rates in routine practice, and presenting feedback on such errors to medical staff. Setting One clinical directorate of a London teaching trust. Methods Ward pharmacists recorded all prescribing errors identified in newly written medication orders on one day each fortnight between February and May 2005. We examined prescribing errors reported on the trust’s medication incident database for the same period. Main outcome measures Prescribing errors identified and recorded by ward pharmacists, prescribing errors reported as incident reports; prescribing error rates per clinical specialty; lead consultants’ views on receiving feedback on errors for their specialty. Results During eight data collection days, 4,995 new medication orders were examined. Of these, 462 (9.2%; 95% confidence interval 8.5 –10.1%) contained at least one prescribing error. There were 474 errors in total. Pharmacists indicated that they would have reported 19 (4%) of the prescribing errors as medication incidents. Eight prescribing errors were reported for the entire four-month study period on non-data collection days. Feedback was presented to lead clinicians of 10 clinical specialties. This included graphical summaries showing how the specialty compared with others, and a list of errors identified. This information was well-received by clinicians. Conclusion Prescribing errors identified by ward pharmacists can be systematically fed back at the level of the clinical specialty; this is acceptable to the consultants involved. Incident report data is subject to gross under-reporting. Routinely providing feedback for each consultant team or for individual prescribers will require more focussed data collection.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital studyQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2006
- The Incidence of Prescribing Errors in Hospital InpatientsDrug Safety, 2005
- Reducing prescribing error: competence, control, and cultureQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2003
- Prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: their incidence and clinical significanceQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2002
- Learning from prescribing errorsQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2002
- Causes of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a prospective studyThe Lancet, 2002
- Early identification of divergent performance in congenital cardiac surgeryEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- What is a prescribing error?Quality in health care : QHC, 2000
- No-Blame Medication Administration Error Reporting by Nursing Staff at a Teaching Hospital in AustraliaInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 1998
- Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted displayThe Lancet, 1997