Computational fluid dynamics and trigeminal sensory examinations of empty nose syndrome patients
- 9 March 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 127 (6), E176-E184
- https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26530
Abstract
Objective The precise pathogenesis of empty nose syndrome (ENS) remains unclear. Various factors such as nasal aerodynamics and sensorineural dysfunction have been suspected, although evidence is limited. This study reported the first examination of both nasal aerodynamics and trigeminal sensory factors in actual ENS patients. Study Design Prospective case control. Methods We enrolled six patients diagnosed with ENS. Three patients had pre‐ and post‐inferior turbinate (IT) reduction computed tomography scans, which allowed comparison of their nasal aerodynamics changes through computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulation. Their symptoms were confirmed through Sino‐nasal Outcome Test‐22, ENS 6‐item Questionnaire, acoustic rhinometry, and rhinomanometry findings. Nasal trigeminal sensitivity that potentially mediates their perception of airflow was assessed via menthol lateralization detection thresholds (LDT) and compared with 14 healthy controls. Results Post‐surgical reductions in nasal resistance were observed and significantly lower than normal (P < 0.05). Computational fluid dynamic analysis showed that, paradoxically for all ENS patients, IT reduction did not draw more airflow to the airway surrounding the ITs, but rather resulted in nasal airflow forming into a narrow jet toward the middle meatus region, leaving the airway surrounding the IT with significantly reduced airflow intensity and air–mucosal interactions (inferior region flow percentage reduced from 35.7% ± 15.9% to post‐surgery 17.7% ± 15.7%, P < 0.05; inferior wall‐shear‐stress reduced from 7.5 ± 4.2 × 10−2 Pa to 3.4 ± 3.1 × 10−2 Pa, P < 0.01). Empty nose syndrome patients also had significantly impaired menthol LDT compared to healthy controls (P < 0.005). Conclusion The results indicated that a combinatory of factors, including paradoxically distorted nasal aerodynamic, impaired sensorineural sensitivity, and potential predisposing conditions, may contribute to the development of ENS. Level of Evidence 3b. Laryngoscope, 127:E176–E184, 2017Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (R01 DC013626)
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perceiving Nasal Patency through Mucosal Cooling Rather than Air Temperature or Nasal ResistancePLOS ONE, 2011
- Perception of specific trigeminal chemosensory agonistsNeuroscience, 2011
- Psychometric validity of the 22‐item Sinonasal Outcome TestClinical Otolaryngology, 2009
- Atrophic rhinitis: a CFD study of air conditioning in the nasal cavityJournal of Applied Physiology, 2007
- Nasal hyperreactivity in allergic and non-allergic rhinitis: a potential risk factor for non-specific building-related illnessIndoor Air, 2007
- The menthol receptor TRPM8 is the principal detector of environmental coldNature, 2007
- Topographical differences in the trigeminal sensitivity of the human nasal mucosaNeuroReport, 2006
- Effects of long-term exposure to volatile irritants on sensory thresholds, negative mucosal potentials, and event-related potentials.Behavioral Neuroscience, 2006
- Effect of Anatomy on Human Nasal Air Flow and Odorant Transport Patterns: Implications for OlfactionChemical Senses, 2004
- The distribution of nasal airflow sensitivity in normal subjectsThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1994