An audit of anticoagulant management to assess anticoagulant control using decision support software
Open Access
- 2 September 2014
- Vol. 4 (9), e005864
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005864
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a computerised self-adjusting anticoagulant algorithm to predict appropriate warfarin dosing and to assess its use in clinical practice. Design A 3-year audit of anticoagulant control in patients managed by doctors and pharmacists using computer decision support and an evaluation of the impact of dose adjustments made by the users. Participants 3660 patients on oral anticoagulants; one-third of patients managed by doctors and two-thirds by pharmacists. Setting Anticoagulant supervision in primary care and pharmacies at 60 sites in New Zealand. Main outcome measures The time in the therapeutic range (TTR), the outcome of adherence to the computer dosing algorithm, the percentage of time the clinicians over-ride the algorithm and the impact of their intervention on anticoagulant control. Results A TTR of 72.9% was achieved for all patients. The TTR was significantly better in patients managed by pharmacists than doctors (75.1% versus 67.4%, pConclusions The clinicians predominantly change the dose when the INR is below the therapeutic range. The changes are not necessary to correct for inaccuracies in the algorithm. The most likely explanation is the clinician's belief that their own dose adjustment would achieve better control; however, in practice, their changes tend to underdose patients. The doctors achieved poorer control than the pharmacists; this is in part due to the action of the doctors over-riding the algorithm. Our results imply that clinicians could achieve better anticoagulant control if they more closely followed the computer algorithm.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variation in Warfarin Dose Adjustment Practice Is Responsible for Differences in the Quality of Anticoagulation Control Between Centers and CountriesCirculation, 2012
- Randomised comparison of a simple warfarin dosing algorithm versus a computerised anticoagulation management system for control of warfarin maintenance therapyThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2012
- Improved anticoagulant control in patients using home international normalized ratio testing and decision support provided through the internetInternal Medicine Journal, 2011
- Effect of a simple two‐step warfarin dosing algorithm on anticoagulant control as measured by time in therapeutic range: a pilot studyJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2010
- Anticoagulation Control and Prediction of Adverse Events in Patients With Atrial FibrillationCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2008
- An international multicenter randomized study of computer-assisted oral anticoagulant dosage vs. medical staff dosageJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2008
- Audit of community‐based anticoagulant monitoring in patients with thromboembolic disease: is frequent testing necessary?Internal Medicine Journal, 2004
- An Analysis of the Lowest Effective Intensity of Prophylactic Anticoagulation for Patients with Nonrheumatic Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Optimal Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation and Recent Cerebral IschemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Prospective comparative study of computer programs used for management of warfarin.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1993