Food and trust in Australia: building a picture
- 1 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Public Health Nutrition
- Vol. 11 (3), 237-245
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980007000250
Abstract
ObjectiveTo explore consumer trust in food, especially people’s experiences that support or diminish trust in the food supply; consumer practices to strengthen trust in food; and views on how trust in the food supply could be increased.SettingAdelaide, South Australia.DesignIn-depth qualitative research interviews and focus groups.SubjectsWomen and men who are primary food providers in families (n = 24).ResultsMedia coverage of food scares and scandals and personal experience of food-borne illness challenged respondents’ trust in the food system. Poor retail food handling practices and questionable marketing ploys by food manufacturers also decreased trust. Buying ‘Made-in-Australia’ produce and following food safety procedures at home were important practices to strengthen food trust. Knowledge of procedures for local food inspection and for national food regulation to keep food safe was scanty. Having a strong regulatory environment governing food safety and quality was considered by respondents to be of prime importance for trust building.DiscussionThe dimensions of trust found in this study are consistent with key theoretical aspects of trust. The need for trust in highly complex environments, in this case the food supply, was evident. Trust was found to be integral to food choice, and negative media reports, the sources of which themselves enjoy various levels of dependability, were found to easily damage trust relationships. The lack of visibility of authoritative monitoring and surveillance, misleading food advertising, and poor retail food handling practices were identified as areas that decreased consumer trust. Respondents also questioned the probity of food labelling, especially health claims and other mechanisms designed to guide food choice. The research highlights the role trust plays in food choice. It also emphasises the importance of a visible authoritative presence in the food system to strengthen trust and provide reassurance to consumers.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Traffic‐light food labelsThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2007
- The unstoppable Australian obesity and diabetes juggernaut. what should politicians do?The Medical Journal of Australia, 2006
- Transgenic Expression of Bean α-Amylase Inhibitor in Peas Results in Altered Structure and ImmunogenicityJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2005
- Societal aspects of genetically modified foodsFood and Chemical Toxicology, 2004
- Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risksAppetite, 2003
- Source of food safety information: whom do adolescents trust?Appetite, 2002
- Influences on meat consumption in AustraliaAppetite, 2001
- UK panel formed to rebuild trust in government science adviceNature, 1999
- The complexities of globalization: The UK as a case study of tensions within the food system and the challenge to food policyAgriculture and Human Values, 1999
- How could the BSE crisis affect nutrient intake? Comparison of beef and non-beef eating meat eaters from the UK Women's Cohort StudyEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1998