Exploring the divergence between self-assessment and self-monitoring
Open Access
- 30 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Advances in Health Sciences Education
- Vol. 16 (3), 311-329
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9263-2
Abstract
Many models of professional self-regulation call upon individual practitioners to take responsibility both for identifying the limits of their own skills and for redressing their identified limits through continuing professional development activities. Despite these expectations, a considerable literature in the domain of self-assessment has questioned the ability of the self-regulating professional to enact this process effectively. In response, authors have recently suggested that the construction of self-assessment as represented in the self-regulation literature is, itself, problematic. In this paper we report a pair of studies that examine the relationship between self-assessment (a global judgment of one’s ability in a particular domain) and self-monitoring (a moment-by-moment awareness of the likelihood that one maintains the skill/knowledge to act in a particular situation). These studies reveal that, despite poor correlations between performance and self-assessments (consistent with what is typically seen in the self-assessment literature), participant performance was strongly related to several measures of self-monitoring including: the decision to answer or defer responding to a question, the amount of time required to make that decision to answer or defer, and the confidence expressed in an answer when provided. This apparent divergence between poor overall self-assessment and effective self-monitoring is considered in terms of how the findings might inform our understanding of the cognitive mechanisms yielding both self-monitoring judgments and self-assessments and how that understanding might be used to better direct education and learning efforts.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternativeMedical Education, 2010
- The Processes and Dimensions of Informed Self-Assessment: A Conceptual ModelAcademic Medicine, 2010
- Slowing Down When You Should: A New Model of Expert JudgmentAcademic Medicine, 2007
- The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus OthersPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002
- Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999
- Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999
- Feeling-of-Knowing Judgments from the Subject's PerspectivePublished by University of Illinois Press ,1996
- The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1992
- A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions trainingAcademic Medicine, 1991
- The development of expertise in dermatologyArchives of Dermatology, 1989