The three Rs: retributive justice, restorative justice, and reconciliation
- 20 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Contemporary Justice Review
- Vol. 11 (4), 331-350
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580802482603
Abstract
This article explores the relationship between retributive justice, restorative justice, and reconciliation. Using the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) as case studies, it begins by examining whether international war crimes tribunals, as dispensers of retributive justice, can contribute to reconciliation in post‐conflict societies. According to their supporters, international war crimes criminals can foster reconciliation in three principal ways: by seeing that justice is done; by establishing the truth about crimes committed; and by individualizing guilt. It will be argued that each of these claims is flawed. War crimes tribunals are an important part of the peace‐building process in post‐conflict societies but it is argued that the retributive justice they deliver is not the most effective means to promote reconciliation. The article’s core premise is that restorative justice has the greatest potential to initiate and further reconciliation and should, therefore, complement the administration of retributive justice. To demonstrate the value of restorative justice in practice, it provides some examples of restorative processes in Rwanda and in the former Yugoslavia.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Next StepCriminal Justice Review, 2007
- Truth, Reconciliation, and the Serbian Victimology SocietyPeace Review, 2006
- Executioners, bystanders and victims: collective guilt, the legacy of denazification and the birth of twentieth-century transitional justiceLegal Studies, 2005
- Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International JusticeInternational Security, 2004
- International justice and domestic politics: post-Tudjman Croatia and the international criminal tribunal for the former YugoslaviaEurope-Asia Studies, 2003
- The Challenge of Linking International Criminal Justice and National Reconciliation: the Case of the ICTRLeiden Journal of International Law, 2003
- A Truth Commission for East Timor: Lessons from South Africa?Journal Of Conflict & Security Law, 2002
- SclerosisPunishment & Society, 2000
- Truth, Reconciliation and Justice: The South African Experience in PerspectiveThe Modern Law Review, 2000
- Coming to Terms with Atrocities: A Review of Accountability Mechanisms for Mass Violations of Human RightsLaw and Contemporary Problems, 1996