Degrees of Freedom: The Interaction of Standards of Practice and Engineering Judgment
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Science, Technology, & Human Values
- Vol. 22 (3), 286-316
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399702200302
Abstract
While the issue of standards has received attention from analysts in science and technology studies, this attention has tended to focus on either units of measurement or compatibility standards. Much less attention has been devoted to equally important standards of practice. These are the procedural or process standards which govern how technologists go about designing and constructing artifacts. Such standards have a substantial documented history in the form of engineering codes of practice. As the embodiment of judgments rendered by a particular community of technological practi tioners, these standards both reflect and shape the exercise of practitioner judgment. This article explores both these functions through examples drawn from structural and software engineering. These examples yield insights regarding both the role of formal procedural standards in technological practice and the unusual nature of software technology.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Boundaries and Quandaries: Establishing a Professional Context for ITInformation Technology & People, 1994
- Metrology: The Creation of Universality by the Circulation of ParticularsSocial Studies of Science, 1993
- Prospects for an engineering discipline of softwareIEEE Software, 1990
- Comments, with reply, on 'The universal-relation data model for logical independence' by M. VardiIEEE Software, 1988
- A computer science perspective of bridge designCommunications of the ACM, 1986
- Understanding the software paradoxACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 1985
- Software StandardsIEEE Software, 1984
- Book reviewsComputer, 1983
- A Standard for Software Quality Assurance PlansComputer, 1979
- The Oregon Report Software Engineering: The Turning PointComputer, 1978