Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging
Open Access
- 1 October 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) in Journal of Vision
- Vol. 9 (11), 28
- https://doi.org/10.1167/9.11.28
Abstract
It has been proposed that visual crowding—the breakdown in recognition that occurs when objects are presented in cluttered scenes—reflects a limit imposed by visual attention. We examined this idea in the context of an orientation averaging task, having subjects judge the mean orientation of a set of oriented signal elements either in isolation, or “crowded” by nearby randomly oriented elements. In some conditions, subjects also had to perform an attentionally demanding secondary task. By measuring performance at different levels of signal orientation variability, we show that crowding increases subjects' local uncertainty (about the orientation of individual elements) but that diverting attention reduces their global efficiency (the effective number of elements they can average over). Furthermore, performance with the same stimulus-sequence, presented multiple times, reveals that crowding does not induce more stimulus-independent variability (as would be predicted by some accounts based on attention). We conclude that crowding and attentional load have dissociable perceptual consequences for orientation averaging, suggesting distinct neural mechanisms for both. For the task we examined, attention can modulate the effects of crowding by changing the efficiency with which information is analyzed by the visual system but since crowding changes local uncertainty, not efficiency, crowding does not reflect an attentional limit.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuliProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- The Normalization Model of AttentionNeuron, 2009
- Crowding: a cortical constraint on object recognitionCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology, 2008
- Crowding is directed to the fovea and preserves only feature contrastJournal of Vision, 2007
- Crowding and surround suppression: Not to be confusedJournal of Vision, 2007
- Visual Clutter Causes High-Magnitude ErrorsPLoS Biology, 2006
- Why use noise?Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1999
- Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortexProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1977
- Stimulus Features in Signal DetectionThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1971
- Retinal Noise and Absolute ThresholdJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1956