A comparison of microbial, enzymatic, chemical and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy methods in forage evaluation
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Animal Feed Science and Technology
- Vol. 20 (3), 219-231
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(88)90045-4
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Digestibility, Intake and Mineral Utilization of Combinations of Grasses and Legumes by LambsJournal of Animal Science, 1987
- Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for Quality Analysis of Sandhills Meadow ForageJournal of Animal Science, 1987
- A comparison of laboratory methods involving single or two-stage cellulase and two-stage rumen inoculum-pepsin treatment for predicting digestibility and intake of hays in sheepAnimal Feed Science and Technology, 1985
- Predicting in-vivo digestibilities of herbages by exhaustive enzymic hydrolysis of cell wallsJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1977
- Prediction of the day matter digestibility of tropical grasses using a pepsin-cellulase assayAnimal Feed Science and Technology, 1977
- Predicting Forage Quality by Infrared Replectance SpectroscopyJournal of Animal Science, 1976
- The effect of pepsin pretreatment of herbage on the prediction of dry matter digestibility from solubility in fungal cellulase solutionsJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1975
- Factors Affecting the Variability of An in Vitro Rumen Fermentation Technique for Estimating Forage QualityJournal of Dairy Science, 1972
- An in vitro Technique for Estimating Digestibility of Treated and Untreated WoodJournal of Animal Science, 1970
- Evaluation of Forages in the Laboratory. V. Comparison of Chemical Analyses, Solubility Tests, and In Vitro FermentationJournal of Dairy Science, 1966