A Retrospective Evaluation of the Storm Surge Produced by Hurricane Gustav (2008): Forecast and Hindcast Results
- 1 December 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Weather and Forecasting
- Vol. 25 (6), 1577-1602
- https://doi.org/10.1175/2010waf2222416.1
Abstract
The evolution and convergence of modeled storm surge were examined using a high-resolution implementation of the Advanced Circulation Coastal Ocean and Storm Surge (ADCIRC) model for Hurricane Gustav (2008). The storm surge forecasts were forced using an asymmetric gradient wind model (AWM), directly coupled to ADCIRC at every time step and at every grid node. A total of 20 forecast advisories and best-track data from the National Hurricane Center (NHC) were used as input parameters into the wind model. Differences in maximum surge elevations were evaluated for ensembles comprised of the final 20, 15, 10, and 5 forecast advisories plus the best track. For this particular storm, the final 10–12 forecast advisories, encompassing the last 2.5–3 days of the storm’s lifetime, give a reasonable estimate of the final storm surge and inundation. The results provide a detailed perspective of the variability in the storm surge due to variability in the meteorological forecast and how this changes as the storm approaches landfall. This finding is closely tied to the consistency and accuracy of the NHC storm track forecasts and the predicted landfall location and, therefore, cannot be generalized to all storms in all locations. Nevertheless, this first attempt to translate variability in forecast meteorology into storm surge variability provides useful insights for guiding the potential use of storm surge models for forecast purposes. Model skill was also evaluated for Hurricane Gustav by comparing observed water levels with hindcast modeled water levels forced by river flow, tides, and several sources of wind data. The AWM (which ingested best-track information from NHC) generated winds that were slightly higher than those from NOAA’s Hurricane Research Division (HRD) H*Wind analyses and substantially greater than the North American Mesoscale (NAM) model. Surge obtained using the AWM more closely matched the observed water levels than that computed using H*Wind; however, this may be due to the neglect of the contribution of wave setup to the surge, especially in exposed areas. Several geographically distinct storm surge response regimes, some characterized by multisurge pulses, were identified and described.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Storm Surge Simulations of Hurricane Ike (2008): Its Impact in Louisiana and TexasPublished by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) ,2010
- A High-Resolution Coupled Riverine Flow, Tide, Wind, Wind Wave, and Storm Surge Model for Southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part II: Synoptic Description and Analysis of Hurricanes Katrina and RitaMonthly Weather Review, 2010
- A High-Resolution Coupled Riverine Flow, Tide, Wind, Wind Wave, and Storm Surge Model for Southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part I: Model Development and ValidationMonthly Weather Review, 2010
- A Real Time Storm Surge Forecasting System Using ADCIRCPublished by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) ,2008
- Storm Surge Simulations for Hurricane Hugo (1989): On the Significance of Inundation AreasJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 2007
- Tidal Freshwater Swamps of the Southeastern United States: Effects of Land Use, Hurricanes, Sea-level Rise, and Climate ChangePublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2007
- Coastal Forecasts and Storm Surge Predictions for Tropical Cyclones: A Timely Partnership ProgramOceanography, 2006
- Grid convergence studies for the prediction of hurricane storm surgeInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1998
- The influence of domain size on the response characteristics of a hurricane storm surge modelJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1994
- An Analytic Model of the Wind and Pressure Profiles in HurricanesMonthly Weather Review, 1980