A Systematic Review of Reliability and Validity Studies of Methods for Measuring Active andPassive Cervical Range of Motion
- 1 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
- Vol. 33 (2), 138-155
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.12.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic reviewEuropean Spine Journal, 2008
- Manual Examination of the Spine: A Systematic Critical Literature Review of ReproducibilityJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 2006
- Prognostic Value of the Quebec Classification of Whiplash-Associated DisordersSpine, 2001
- Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematicsClinical Biomechanics, 2000
- Clinical tests of the sacroiliac jointManual Therapy, 2000
- The reliability of the three-dimensional FASTRAK measurement system in measuring cervical spine and shoulder range of motion in healthy subjectsRheumatology, 2000
- Assessment of published reliability studies for cervical spine range-of-motion measurement toolsJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 2000
- Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint*1A systematic methodological review. Part 1: ReliabilityManual Therapy, 2000
- Meta-Analysis of Normative Cervical MotionSpine, 1999
- Reliability of Measurements of Cervical Spine Range of Motion—Comparison of Three MethodsPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1991