An eco‐physiological model for interspecific competition, applied to the influence of Chenopodium album L. on sugar beet. I. Model description and parameterization
- 1 December 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Weed Research
- Vol. 32 (6), 437-450
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1992.tb01905.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Competition between maize and Echinochloa crus-galli analysed by a hyperbolic regression modelAnnals of Applied Biology, 1989
- Modelling the effects of weeds on crop productionWeed Research, 1988
- An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other modelsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1985
- Variation in Quantum Yield for CO2 Uptake among C3 and C4 PlantsPlant Physiology, 1983
- Geographical variation in populations of Chenopodium album resistant and susceptible to atrazine. II. Photoperiod and reciprocal transplant studiesCanadian Journal of Botany, 1982
- The effects of temperature on leaf growth of sugar beet varietiesAnnals of Applied Biology, 1980
- Dynamics of Leaf Growth and Development in SugarbeetsJournal of Sugarbeet Research, 1978
- Photosynthesis and Respiration by Healthy and Beet Yellows Virus‐Infected Sugar Beets (Beta vulgaris L.)1Crop Science, 1972
- Developmental Physiology of Sugar Beet: I. THE INFLUENCE OF LIGHT AND TEMPERATURE ON GROWTHJournal of Experimental Botany, 1968
- Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grassProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1948