Measuring the Mathematical Attitudes of Elementary Students: The Effects of a 4-Point or 5-Point Likert-Type Scale
- 13 April 2010
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 70 (5), 796-807
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410366694
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare how students in Grades 3 to 6 respond to a mathematics attitudes instrument with a 4-point Likert-type scale compared with one with an additional neutral point (a 5-point Likert-type scale). The 606 participating students from six elementary and middle schools randomly received either the 4-point or 5-point format of the Math and Me Survey. Regardless of whether a neutral midpoint was offered or not, the structure of the instrument was virtually the same, with equal intercepts, means, variances and covariances, pattern coefficients, and nearly all residuals. The 5-point scale is preferred with this population because with this format the reliability estimate for the Mathematical Self-Perceptions subscale was higher (p = .049), and the pattern coefficients were stronger. Additionally, this format provided less model misfit than the 4-point format. Based on these findings, the authors recommend administration of the Math and Me Survey in the 5-point format. These findings also indicate that despite what some educators and educational experts believe, children in Grades 3 to 6 are capable of discriminating among five response options and do not tend toward the neutral point more so than with a 4-point scale.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Number and Type of Response Choices on Internal Consistency ReliabilityPublished by SAGE Publications ,1994
- A Psychometric Evaluation of 4-Point and 6-Point Likert-Type Scales in Relation to Reliability and ValidityApplied Psychological Measurement, 1994
- Instrument Development in the Affective DomainPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1993
- Using Likert Scales in L2 Research. A Researcher CommentsTESOL Quarterly, 1993
- Number of Response Categories and Statistics on a Teacher Rating ScaleEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
- Response format of the Job Descriptive Index: Assessment of reliability and validity by the multitrait–multimethod matrix.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982
- THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NUMBER OF RESPONSE CATEGORIES AND RELIABILITY OF LIKERT-TYPE QUESTIONNAIRES1Journal of Educational Measurement, 1974
- Number of Scale Points and the Reliability of ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1965
- Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test DesignEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1950
- Optimal refinement of the rating scale.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1939