Capturing specific abilities as a window into human individuality: The example of face recognition
Open Access
- 1 September 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Cognitive Neuropsychology
- Vol. 29 (5-6), 360-392
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2012.753433
Abstract
Proper characterization of each individual's unique pattern of strengths and weaknesses requires good measures of diverse abilities. Here, we advocate combining our growing understanding of neural and cognitive mechanisms with modern psychometric methods in a renewed effort to capture human individuality through a consideration of specific abilities. We articulate five criteria for the isolation and measurement of specific abilities, then apply these criteria to face recognition. We cleanly dissociate face recognition from more general visual and verbal recognition. This dissociation stretches across ability as well as disability, suggesting that specific developmental face recognition deficits are a special case of a broader specificity that spans the entire spectrum of human face recognition performance. Item-by-item results from 1,471 web-tested participants, included as supplementary information, fuel item analyses, validation, norming, and item response theory (IRT) analyses of our three tests: (a) the widely used Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT); (b) an Abstract Art Memory Test (AAMT), and (c) a Verbal Paired-Associates Memory Test (VPMT). The availability of this data set provides a solid foundation for interpreting future scores on these tests. We argue that the allied fields of experimental psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and vision science could fuel the discovery of additional specific abilities to add to face recognition, thereby providing new perspectives on human individuality.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Robust Method of Measuring Other-Race and Other-Ethnicity Effects: The Cambridge Face Memory Test FormatPLOS ONE, 2012
- Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritableProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition abilityPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2009
- Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humansProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsisSpatial Vision, 2008
- Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2007
- Convergent, Discriminant, and Incremental Validity of Competing Measures of Emotional IntelligencePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003
- When Does Semantic Similarity Help Episodic Retrieval?Journal of Memory and Language, 2002
- Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligenceIntelligence, 1999
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959