FROM INEQUALITY TO DIFFERENCE: COLONIAL CONTRADICTIONS OF CLASS AND ETHNICITY IN 'SOCIALIST' CHINA
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Cultural Studies
- Vol. 14 (3-4), 531-561
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380050130437
Abstract
Through an historical ethnography of the imbrication of class and ethnicity in socialist China, this paper studies socialism as another kind of colonialism with its peculiar, contradictory ramifications of universalism and particularism. The ‘colonial’ cultural politics of socialism is explored in Inner Mongolia, the northern frontier of China, where the historical formation of the social and ethnic relationship defies any clear-cut dichotomy of colonizer and colonized. In the first half of the twentieth century, Inner Mongolia was colonized by Chinese warlords. Yet, at the same time, the majority of the Chinese population in Inner Mongolia were poor peasants leasing Mongol land. Nonetheless, the Mongols won a limited ethnic autonomy within China in 1947 by applying Leninist colonial liberation ideology, defining the Mongols as a collective group colonized by the Chinese. However,the socialist ideology based on class analysis of the social relationship during the land reform, effectively enabled the Chinese to designate many Mongols as class enemies, thereby justifying the redistribution of Mongol land among the Chinese who constituted the majority in Inner Mongolia. The ensuing ethnic violence forced Mongol leaders, who were both agents of the Chinese Communist Party and representatives of the Mongolian nationality, to press for an explicit nationality policy to defend the nominal ethnic autonomy of Inner Mongolia. Yet, this deployment of ethnic priniciple amid China's class struggle campaign was interpreted as betrayal of the socialist principle, thus leading to a collective Chinese violence against the Mongols during the Cultural Revolution. The paper suggests that, instead of a sterile debate of subaltern representation, which often reflects the scholars' own ‘position’ devoid of social context, an historical ethnography may better illustrate the historical contingencies in the practice of subalternity in socialist China.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new appraisal of democratic reform in the pastoral zone of Inner Mongolia in the 1940sCentral Asian Survey, 1998
- The Dialectics of DecolonizationNationalism and Labor Movements in Postwar French AfricaPublished by University of California Press ,1997
- National Past-TimesPublished by Duke University Press ,1997
- Rescuing History from the NationPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1995
- MulticulturalismPublished by JSTOR ,1994
- The Subaltern Talks Back: Reflections on Subaltern Theory and Chinese Historypositions: asia critique, 1993
- Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for "Indian" Pasts?Representations, 1992
- In Other WordsPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1990
- Can the Subaltern Speak?Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1988