Governing insecurity: contingency planning, protection, resilience
- 20 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Economy and Society
- Vol. 38 (2), 230-254
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140902786611
Abstract
How should we understand the politics of security today? This article addresses this question from one particular perspective, that of ‘biosecurity’. It examines contemporary strategies for managing biorisks in three European states: France, Germany and the United Kingdom. We suggest that the framing of threat and response differs, even within Europe, and that one can identify three different configurations: contingency planning, protection and resilience. Each of these embodies a significantly different way of reconciling fundamental imperatives for those who would govern a liberal society today – the imperative of freedom and the imperative of security.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Security, Territory, PopulationPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2009
- Securing Life: The Emerging Practices of BiosecurityEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2008
- Enacting catastrophe: preparedness, insurance, budgetary rationalizationEconomy and Society, 2008
- Biopolitics of security in the 21st century: an introductionReview of International Studies, 2008
- Distributed Preparedness: The Spatial Logic of Domestic Security in the United StatesEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2008
- Preparing for the Next EmergencyPublic Culture, 2007
- Rationality, Risk and Response: A Research Agenda for BiosecurityBioSocieties, 2006
- Governable catastrophes: a comment on BougenEconomy and Society, 2003
- Powers of FreedomPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1999
- The Taming of ChancePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990