The Impact of Telehealthcare on the Quality and Safety of Care: A Systematic Overview
Open Access
- 19 August 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (8), e71238
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071238
Abstract
Telehealthcare involves the use of information and communication technologies to deliver healthcare at a distance and to support patient self-management through remote monitoring and personalised feedback. It is timely to scrutinise the evidence regarding the benefits, risks and costs of telehealthcare. Two reviewers searched for relevant systematic reviews published from January 1997 to November 2011 in: The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, IndMed and PakMed. Reviewers undertook independent quality assessment of studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for systematic reviews. 1,782 review articles were identified, from which 80 systematic reviews were selected for inclusion. These covered a range of telehealthcare models involving both synchronous (live) and asynchronous (store-and-forward) interactions between provider and patients. Many studies showed no differences in outcomes between telehealthcare and usual care. Several reviews highlighted the large number of short-term (<12 months) feasibility studies with under 20 participants. Effects of telehealthcare on health service indicators were reported in several reviews, particularly reduced hospitalisations. The reported clinical effectiveness of telehealthcare interventions for patients with long-term conditions appeared to be greatest in those with more severe disease at high-risk of hospitalisation and death. The failure of many studies to adequately describe the intervention makes it difficult to disentangle the contributions of technological and human/organisational factors on the outcomes reported. Evidence on the cost-effectiveness of telehealthcare remains sparse. Patient safety considerations were absent from the evaluative telehealthcare literature. Policymakers and planners need to be aware that investment in telehealthcare will not inevitably yield clinical or economic benefits. It is likely that the greatest gains will be achieved for patients at highest risk of serious outcomes. There is a need for longer-term studies in order to determine whether the benefits demonstrated in time limited trials are sustained.Keywords
This publication has 98 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2013
- Effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological outcomes over 12 months (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested study of patient reported outcomes in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2013
- Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional studyThe Lancet, 2012
- Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: evidence that the digital divide extends beyond accessJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011
- Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventionsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Computer-based interventions for drug use disorders: A systematic reviewJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 2010
- Telemonitoring in Patients with Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Challenges in ethics, safety, best practices, and oversight regarding HIT vendors, their customers, and patients: a report of an AMIA special task forceJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2010
- Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysisDiabetic Medicine, 2010
- A Review of eHealth Interventions for Physical Activity and Dietary Behavior ChangeAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007