Abstract
In the field of learning disabilities, there is confusion and disagreement about what constitutes a learning disability. To determine the degree of controversy or consensus at the state level, questionnaires focusing on six LD topics were sent to representatives in each state education agency (SEA) and the District of Columbia. The topics were term(s) used, definition, criteria for identification, the likelihood of change in the definition and/or criteria, prevalence, and services for LD students. In general, more consensus than controversy exists when broad areas are considered. Furthermore, changes in some SEA definitions and/or criteria are probable, and serve as one indicator that stability in the field has not been reached.

This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit: