Queer Acts and the Politics of "Direct Address": Rethinking Law, Culture, and Community

Abstract

A question intimated by some contemporary scholarship (but not yet fully explored) is how cultural practices that law both enables and limits might be related to new styles of politics and redefinitions of community. This query is first explored in the context of Queer Nation's response to the decision in Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), which reduced homosexual identity to a single behavior. Queers' subsequent embrace of a cultural politics of ''direct address'' suggests that the transformation of identities and communities must be built from social and cultural practices that seek to redefine citizens' affiliations. While ''turning away from the law'' is one strategy for redefining political practice, the case of Karen Ulane-a transsexual who was fred after having sex reassignment surgery-suggests another: The articulation of a queer notion of ''nonidentity'' within the legal field may afford possibilities for destabilizing dominant legal classifications such as ''sex'' and ''gender.''