A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery
- 13 November 2008
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 115 (13), 1688-1694
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01961.x
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the maternal and neonatal morbidity of operative vaginal delivery in relation to the use of episiotomy. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Two urban maternity units in Scotland and England. Population All nonrandomised nulliparous women delivered by forceps or vacuum during the recruitment period of a clinical trial evaluating the use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. Methods Use of episiotomy was compared to no episiotomy for all operative vaginal deliveries with sub‐group analyses for forceps or vacuum deliveries. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was anal sphincter tearing (third or fourth degree). Secondary outcomes included postpartum haemorrhage, neonatal trauma and pelvic floor symptoms up until 10 days postpartum. Results A total of 1360 women were included in the study, of whom 294 (21.6%) did not receive an episiotomy. Vacuum delivery was associated with less use of episiotomy than forceps (56.1 versus 89.4%, OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.11–0.20). Anal sphincter tear rates were not statistically different with use of episiotomy compared with no episiotomy (9.9 versus 7.1%, adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.66–1.87). Episiotomy use was associated with higher rates of postpartum haemorrhage (28.5 versus 18.4%, adjusted OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.21–2.45), need for moderate or strong analgesia (90.5 versus 67.6%, adjusted OR 3.70, 95% CI 2.60–5.27), perineal infection (5.1 versus 1.4%, adjusted OR 4.04, 95% CI 1.44–11.37) and neonatal trauma (38.1 versus 22.0%, adjusted OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.20–2.27). Use of episiotomy did not reduce the risk of shoulder dystocia (3.5 versus 1.7%, adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.53–3.85). Conclusions The use of episiotomy did not reduce or greatly increase anal sphincter tears and was associated with greater maternal and neonatal morbidity. This may reflect the complexity of deliveries. The role of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery should be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal deliveryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2007
- Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?*BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2006
- Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal deliveryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2005
- Pelvic floor morbidity at 3 years after instrumental delivery and cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the impact of a subsequent deliveryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005
- Vacuum-assisted delivery: a reviewThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2004
- Pelvic floor morbidity up to one year after difficult instrumental delivery and cesarean section in the second stage of labor: A cohort studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric careBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2003
- Obstetric practice and faecal incontinence three months after deliveryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001
- Effect of Mode of Delivery in Nulliparous Women on Neonatal Intracranial InjuryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damageObstetrics & Gynecology, 1998