An Apgar Score for Surgery
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 204 (2), 201-208
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.11.011
Abstract
Surgical teams have not had a routine, reliable measure of patient condition at the end of an operation. We aimed to develop an Apgar score for the field of surgery, an outcomes score that teams could calculate at the end of any general or vascular surgical procedure to accurately grade a patient's condition and chances of major complications or death. We derived our surgical score in a retrospective analysis of data from medical records and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for 303 randomly selected patients undergoing colectomy at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston. The primary outcomes measure was incidence of major complication or death within 30 days of operation. We validated the score in two prospective, randomly selected cohorts: 102 colectomy patients and 767 patients undergoing general or vascular operations at the same institution. A 10-point score based on a patient's estimated amount of blood loss, lowest heart rate, and lowest mean arterial pressure during general or vascular operations was significantly associated with major complications or death within 30 days (p < 0.0001; c-index = 0.72). Of 767 general and vascular surgery patients, 29 (3.8%) had a surgical score <or= 4. Major complications or death occurred in 17 of these 29 patients (58.6%) within 30 days. By comparison, among 220 patients with scores of 9 or 10, only 8 (3.6%) experienced major complications or died (relative risk 16.1; 95% CI, 7.6-34.0; p < 0.0001). A simple score based on blood loss, heart rate, and blood pressure can be useful in rating the condition of patients after general or vascular operations.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anesthetic Management and One-Year Mortality After Noncardiac SurgeryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2005
- The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Non-Veterans Administration HospitalsAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- The Continuing Value of the Apgar Score for the Assessment of Newborn InfantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Arterial Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Discrepancies Between Handwritten and Computerized Anesthesia RecordsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2000
- Preanesthesia Evaluation of the Surgical PatientASA Refresher Courses in Anesthesiology, 1996
- POSSUM: A scoring system for surgical auditBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Differences Between Handwritten and Automatic Blood Pressure RecordsAnesthesiology, 1989
- APACHE—acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification systemCritical Care Medicine, 1981
- Comparison of Subjective Estimates by Surgeons and Anaesthetists of Operative Blood LossBMJ, 1972
- A Proposal for a New Method of Evaluation of the Newborn Infant.Anesthesia & Analgesia, 1953