In Vitro Tumor Models: Advantages, Disadvantages, Variables, and Selecting the Right Platform
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 12 February 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
- Vol. 4, 12
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2016.00012
Abstract
In vitro tumor models have provided important tools for cancer research and serve as low-cost screening platforms for drug therapies; however, cancer recurrence remains largely unchecked due to metastasis, which is the cause of the majority of cancer related deaths. The need for an improved understanding of the progression and treatment of cancer has pushed for increased accuracy and physiological relevance of in vitro tumor models. As a result, in vitro tumor models have concurrently increased in complexity and their output parameters further diversified, since these models have progressed beyond simple proliferation, invasion, and cytotoxicity screens and have begun recapitulating critical steps in the metastatic cascade, such as intravasation, extravasation, angiogenesis, matrix remodeling, and tumor cell dormancy. Advances in tumor cell biology, 3D cell culture, tissue engineering, biomaterials, microfabrication, and microfluidics have enabled rapid development of new in vitro tumor models that often incorporate multiple cell types, extracellular matrix materials, and spatial and temporal introduction of soluble factors. Other innovations include the incorporation of perfusable microvessels to simulate the tumor vasculature and model intravasation and extravasation. The drive towards precision medicine has increased interest in adapting in vitro tumor models for patient-specific therapies, clinical management, and assessment of metastatic potential. Here, we review the wide range of current in vitro tumor models and summarize their advantages, disadvantages, and suitability in modeling specific aspects of the metastatic cascade and drug treatment.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (R01CA170629)
This publication has 126 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis projectNature Genetics, 2013
- The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivityNature, 2012
- Micro-ring structures stabilize microdroplets to enable long term spheroid culture in 384 hanging drop array platesBiomedical Microdevices, 2011
- Tumor grafts derived from women with breast cancer authentically reflect tumor pathology, growth, metastasis and disease outcomesNature Medicine, 2011
- A versatile valve-enabled microfluidic cell co-culture platform and demonstration of its applications to neurobiology and cancer biologyBiomedical Microdevices, 2011
- Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next GenerationCell, 2011
- Suppression of Prostate Cancer Cell Rolling and Adhesion to Endothelium by 1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3The American Journal of Pathology, 2011
- A distinctive role for focal adhesion proteins in three-dimensional cell motilityNature, 2010
- Chitosan–alginate 3D scaffolds as a mimic of the glioma tumor microenvironmentBiomaterials, 2010
- Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) effects on endometrial carcinoma in vitro proliferation, invasion, and matrix metalloproteinase activityGynecologic Oncology, 2010