Comparison between Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens for Detection of Respiratory Viruses by Multiplex Reverse Transcription-PCR
Open Access
- 1 January 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 55 (1), 226-233
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01704-16
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) are being widely used as specimens for multiplex real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR for respiratory virus detection. However, it remains unclear whether NPS specimens are optimal for all viruses targeted by multiplex RT-PCR. In addition, the procedure to obtain NPS specimens causes coughing in most patients, which possibly increases the risk of nosocomial spread of viruses. In this study, paired NPS and saliva specimens were collected from 236 adult male patients with suspected acute respiratory illnesses. Specimens were tested for 16 respiratory viruses by multiplex real-time RT-PCR. Among the specimens collected from the 236 patients, at least 1 respiratory virus was detected in 183 NPS specimens (77.5%) and 180 saliva specimens (76.3%). The rates of detection of respiratory viruses were comparable for NPS and saliva specimens ( P = 0.766). Nine virus species and 349 viruses were isolated, 256 from NPS specimens and 273 from saliva specimens ( P = 0.1574). Adenovirus was detected more frequently in saliva samples ( P < 0.0001), whereas influenza virus type A and human rhinovirus were detected more frequently in NPS specimens ( P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0289, respectively). The possibility of false-positive adenovirus detection from saliva samples was excluded by direct sequencing. In conclusion, neither of the sampling methods was consistently more sensitive than the other. We suggest that these cost-effective methods for detecting respiratory viruses in mixed NPS-saliva specimens might be valuable for future studies.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison among nasopharyngeal swab, nasal wash, and oropharyngeal swab for respiratory virus detection in adults with acute pharyngitisBMC Infectious Diseases, 2013
- Comparison of nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and nasopharyngeal wash collection methods for respiratory virus detection in hospitalized children using real-time polymerase chain reactionJournal of Virological Methods, 2012
- Improved Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Pediatric Outpatients with Acute Respiratory Illness by Real-Time PCR Using Nasopharyngeal Flocked SwabsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2011
- Comparison of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs for the Diagnosis of Eight Respiratory Viruses by Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR AssaysPLOS ONE, 2011
- Identification of Respiratory Viruses in Adults: Nasopharyngeal versus Oropharyngeal SamplingJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2009
- Optimal Sampling Sites and Methods for Detection of Pathogens Possibly Causing Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract InfectionsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2009
- Mixed Respiratory Virus InfectionsJournal of Clinical Virology, 2008
- Role of Cell Culture for Virus Detection in the Age of TechnologyClinical Microbiology Reviews, 2007
- Review of Aerosol Transmission of Influenza A VirusEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Comparative Sequence Analysis of the Hexon Gene in the Entire Spectrum of Human Adenovirus Serotypes: Phylogenetic, Taxonomic, and Clinical ImplicationsJournal of Virology, 2005