FAMILY CAREGIVER EDUCATION AND SUPPORT PROGRAMS: USING HUMANISTIC APPROACHES TO EVALUATE PROGRAM EFFECTS
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Educational Gerontology
- Vol. 23 (2), 129-142
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0360127970230204
Abstract
This article critiques previous caregiver evaluation efforts and describes the evaluation of an education and support program for family caregivers in British Columbia, Canada. Thirty family caregivers, predominantly adult daughters caring for parents with dementia, participated in one of three facilitator‐led groups offering the Supporting Caregivers in British Columbia program. They met weekly for 2 hr over a 10‐week period. A rich array of qualitative data indicated that caregivers perceived the program to have numerous positive effects on their caregiving, thus demonstrating the importance of learner perspectives and experiences in the evaluation process. The study offers a distinct alternative to experimental and quasi‐experimental designs for evaluating educational programs.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spirituality Among CaregiversImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1994
- A Meta-analytic Review of Interventions for Caregiver Distress: Recommendations for Future ResearchThe Gerontologist, 1993
- Alzheimer??s Disease and Family CaregivingNursing Research, 1991
- Participatory action research with self‐help groups: An alternative paradigm for inquiry and actionAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 1991
- Self-Help groups offer prime areas for nurse researchersJournal of Professional Nursing, 1990
- Self‐help groups at the turning point: Emerging egalitarian alliances with the formal health care system?American Journal of Community Psychology, 1990
- Longitudinal Studies as InterventionNursing Research, 1989
- Play It Again Sam -- There Is No ImpactThe Gerontologist, 1989
- Parent Care as a Normative Family StressThe Gerontologist, 1985
- Experiential Knowledge: A New Concept for the Analysis of Self-Help GroupsSocial Service Review, 1976