Structural Models of Human eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 Reveal Two Distinct Surface Clusters of Sequence Variation and Potential Differences in Phosphorylation
Open Access
- 28 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 4 (7), e6315
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006315
Abstract
Despite sharing 92% sequence identity, paralogous human translation elongation factor 1 alpha-1 (eEF1A1) and elongation factor 1 alpha-2 (eEF1A2) have different but overlapping functional profiles. This may reflect the differential requirements of the cell-types in which they are expressed and is consistent with complex roles for these proteins that extend beyond delivery of tRNA to the ribosome. To investigate the structural basis of these functional differences, we created and validated comparative three-dimensional (3-D) models of eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 on the basis of the crystal structure of homologous eEF1A from yeast. The spatial location of amino acid residues that vary between the two proteins was thereby pinpointed, and their surface electrostatic and lipophilic properties were compared. None of the variations amongst buried amino acid residues are judged likely to have a major structural effect on the protein fold, or to affect domain-domain interactions. Nearly all the variant surface-exposed amino acid residues lie on one face of the protein, in two proximal but distinct sub-clusters. The result of previously performed mutagenesis in yeast may be interpreted as confirming the importance of one of these clusters in actin-bundling and filament disorganization. Interestingly, some variant residues lie in close proximity to, and in a few cases show differences in interactions with, residues previously inferred to be directly involved in binding GTP/GDP, eEF1Bα and aminoacyl-tRNA. Additional sequence-based predictions, in conjunction with the 3-D models, reveal likely differences in phosphorylation sites that could reconcile some of the functional differences between the two proteins. The revelation and putative functional assignment of two distinct sub-clusters on the surface of the protein models should enable rational site-directed mutagenesis, including homologous reverse-substitution experiments, to map surface binding patches onto these proteins. The predicted variant-specific phosphorylation sites also provide a basis for experimental verification by mutagenesis. The models provide a structural framework for interpretation of the resulting functional analysis.Keywords
This publication has 77 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcome of a Workshop on Applications of Protein Models in Biomedical ResearchStructure, 2009
- eEF1A Is a Novel Component of the Mammalian Nuclear Protein Export MachineryMolecular Biology of the Cell, 2008
- Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Independence of the G-protein eEF1A through Novel Mutant Forms and Biochemical PropertiesPublished by Elsevier BV ,2008
- Signaling networks assembled by oncogenic EGFR and c-MetProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- A2 isoform of mammalian translation factor eEF1A displays increased tyrosine phosphorylation and ability to interact with different signalling moleculesThe International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, 2007
- Expression of eEF1A2 is associated with clear cell histology in ovarian carcinomas: overexpression of the gene is not dependent on modifications at the EEF1A2 locusBritish Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Global proteomic profiling of phosphopeptides using electron transfer dissociation tandem mass spectrometryProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- The Protein Data BankNucleic Acids Research, 2000
- Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programsNucleic Acids Research, 1997
- Comparative Protein Modelling by Satisfaction of Spatial RestraintsJournal of Molecular Biology, 1993