Rates of obstetric intervention among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW: a population-based descriptive study
Open Access
- 10 September 2012
- Vol. 2 (5), e001723
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001723
Abstract
To compare the risk profile of women giving birth in private and public hospitals and the rate of obstetric intervention during birth compared with previous published rates from a decade ago. Population-based descriptive study. New South Wales, Australia. 691 738 women giving birth to a singleton baby during the period 2000 to 2008. Risk profile of women giving birth in public and private hospitals, intervention rates and changes in these rates over the past decade. Among low-risk women rates of obstetric intervention were highest in private hospitals and lowest in public hospitals. Low-risk primiparous women giving birth in a private hospital compared to a public hospital had higher rates of induction (31% vs 23%); instrumental birth (29% vs 18%); caesarean section (27% vs 18%), epidural (53% vs 32%) and episiotomy (28% vs 12%) and lower normal vaginal birth rates (44% vs 64%). Low-risk multiparous women had higher rates of instrumental birth (7% vs 3%), caesarean section (27% vs 16%), epidural (35% vs 12%) and episiotomy (8% vs 2%) and lower normal vaginal birth rates (66% vs 81%). As interventions were introduced during labour, the rate of interventions in birth increased. Over the past decade these interventions have increased by 5% for women in public hospitals and by over 10% for women in private hospitals. Among low-risk primiparous women giving birth in private hospitals 15 per 100 women had a vaginal birth with no obstetric intervention compared to 35 per 100 women giving birth in a public hospital. Low-risk primiparous women giving birth in private hospitals have more chance of a surgical birth than a normal vaginal birth and this phenomenon has increased markedly in the past decade.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2012
- Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean deliveryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011
- The health implications of birth by Caesarean sectionBiological Reviews, 2011
- Cesarean Birth in the United States: Epidemiology, Trends, and OutcomesClinics in Perinatology, 2008
- Admission of Term Infants to Neonatal Intensive Care: A Population‐Based StudyBirth, 2007
- Maternal Morbidity Associated With Multiple Repeat Cesarean DeliveriesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Level of Perinatal Care of the Maternity Unit and Rate of Cesarean in Low-Risk NulliparasObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Maternal Risk Profiles and the Primary Cesarean Rate in the United States, 1991–2002American Journal of Public Health, 2006
- Costing the cascade: estimating the cost of increased obstetric intervention in childbirth using population data.2003
- The rise in caesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower thresholdBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998