Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 175 (6), 2011-2017
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(06)00265-5
Abstract
We compared the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy through a systematic assessment of the literature. Literature databases were searched from 1996 to December 2004 inclusive. Studies comparing transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy or robot assisted radical prostatectomy with open radical retropubic prostatectomy or radical perineal prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer were included. Comparisons between different laparoscopic approaches were also included. We identified 30 comparative studies, of which none were randomized controlled trials. There were 21 studies comparing laparoscopic with open prostatectomy with a total of 2,301 and 1,757 patients, respectively, and 9 comparing different laparoscopic approaches with a total of 1,148 patients. In terms of safety there did not appear to be any important differences in the complication rate between laparoscopic and open approaches. However, blood loss and transfusions were lower for laparoscopic approaches. In terms of efficacy operative time was longer for laparoscopic than for open prostatectomy but length of stay and duration of catheterization were shorter. Positive margin rates and recurrence-free survival were similar. Continence and potency were not well reported but they appeared similar for the 2 approaches. There were no important differences between laparoscopic approaches. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is emerging as an alternative to open radical prostatectomy but randomized, controlled trials considering patient relevant outcomes, such as survival, continence and potency, with sufficient followup are required to determine relative safety and efficacy.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Early Oncologic Results of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy by Extraperitoneal versus Transperitoneal ApproachEuropean Urology, 2004
- Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: current statusBJU International, 2004
- Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Part IIBJU International, 2004
- Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Part IBJU International, 2004
- Comparison of Transperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Using Match-Pair AnalysisEuropean Urology, 2004
- Is Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Better Than Traditional Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy?: An Analysis of Peri-Operative Morbidity in Two Contemporary Series in ItalyEuropean Urology, 2003
- Comparison of Quality of Life Following Laparoscopic and Open Prostatectomy for Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2003
- Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyAORN Journal, 2002
- Laparascopic Prostate Surgery SuggestedJAMA, 2001
- POTENCY, CONTINENCE AND COMPLICATION RATES IN 1,870 CONSECUTIVE RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMIESJournal of Urology, 1999