A Mixed Methods Approach
- 9 September 2011
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Mixed Methods Research
- Vol. 6 (3), 166-183
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811420572
Abstract
This article highlights the benefits of jointly using cultural modeling and cultural consensus analysis for the purpose of triangulation in research in which a cultural group’s point of view is desired. Cultural models are those presupposed, taken-for-granted models of knowledge and thought used in the course of everyday life to guide a person’s understanding of the world. These models can be identified by discourse analysis. Cultural consensus analysis is a quantitative-based methodological tool that asks if shared knowledge of a specific cultural domain exists within a group of informants. In presenting their results, the authors recommend the joint use of these two methods in research in which a broad understanding of a cultural group’s perspective on a given topic is needed.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Closed and Open-Ended Question Tools in a Telephone Survey About ``The Good Teacher''Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2009
- Cultural Models of Gendeer in Sri Lanka and the United StatesEthnology, 2002
- Remembering What One Knows and the Construction of the Past: A Comparison of Cultural Consensus Theory and Cultural Schema TheoryEthos, 2000
- Between Discourse and Schema: Reformulating a Cultural‐Historical Approach to Culture and MindAnthropology & Education Quarterly, 1995
- Triangles and crystals: On the geometry of qualitative researchResearch in Nursing & Health, 1995
- Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation DesignsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1989
- explaining high blood pressure: variation in knowledge about illnessAmerican Ethnologist, 1988
- Recent Applications of Cultural Consensus TheoryAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1987
- Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant AccuracyAmerican Anthropologist, 1986
- Intracultural Variation in Folk Medical Knowledge: A Comparison Between Curers and NoncurersAmerican Anthropologist, 1986