Third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors
Top Cited Papers
- 3 July 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 120 (12), 1516-1525
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12363
Abstract
Objective To describe the trends of severe perineal tears in England and to investigate to what extent the changes in related risk factors could explain the observed trends. Design A retrospective cohort study of singleton deliveries from a national administrative database. Setting The English National Health Service between 1 April 2000 and 31 March 2012. Population A cohort of 1 035 253 primiparous women who had a singleton, term, cephalic, vaginal birth. Methods Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the impact of financial year of birth (labelled by starting year), adjusting for major risk factors. Main outcome measure The rate of third-degree (anal sphincter is torn) or fourth-degree (anal sphincter as well as rectal mucosa are torn) perineal tears. Results The rate of reported third- or fourth-degree perineal tears tripled from 1.8 to 5.9% during the study period. The rate of episiotomy varied between 30 and 36%. An increasing proportion of ventouse deliveries (from 67.8 to 78.6%) and non-instrumental deliveries (from 15.1 to 19.1%) were assisted by an episiotomy. A higher risk of third- or fourth-degree perineal tears was associated with a maternal age above 25 years, instrumental delivery (forceps and ventouse), especially without episiotomy, Asian ethnicity, a more affluent socio-economic status, higher birthweight, and shoulder dystocia. Conclusions Changes in major risk factors are unlikely explanations for the observed increase in the rate of third- or fourth-degree tears. The improved recognition of tears following the implementation of a standardised classification of perineal tears is the most likely explanation.Keywords
Funding Information
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating maternity care using national administrative health datasets: How are statistics affected by the quality of data on method of delivery?BMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort studyBMJ, 2011
- Systematic review of discharge coding accuracyJournal of Public Health, 2011
- The timing of elective caesarean delivery between 2000 and 2009 in EnglandBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2011
- Trends in major modifiable risk factors for severe perineal trauma, 1996-2006International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2008
- Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?*BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2006
- Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damageBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Obstetric anal sphincter lacerationsPublished by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ,2001
- Risk of repetition of a severe perineal lacerationPublished by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ,1999
- Obstetric perineal trauma: An audit of trainingJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1995