Comparison of awake spinal with awake caudal anesthesia in preterm and ex-preterm infants for herniotomy1
- 23 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pediatric Anesthesia
- Vol. 20 (7), 620-624
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03316.x
Abstract
Caudal anesthesia was shown to be technically less difficult than SA and to have a higher success rate. Its application as awake regional anesthesia technique in these patients seems more appropriate than SAKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anesthetic Effects on the Developing BrainAnesthesiology, 2009
- Anesthesia and Outcome after Neonatal SurgeryAnesthesiology, 2008
- Anesthesia and Neurodevelopment in ChildrenAnesthesiology, 2008
- Spinal anesthesia in neonates and infants – a single‐center experience of 505 casesPediatric Anesthesia, 2007
- Post-operative recovery after inguinal herniotomy in ex-premature infants: comparison between sevoflurane and spinal anaesthesiaBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001
- Spinal and caudal anaesthesia in ex-premature babiesBest Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 2000
- Postoperative outcome in high‐risk infants undergoing herniorrhaphy: comparison between spinal and general anaesthesiaAnaesthesia, 1998
- Postoperative Apnea in Former Preterm Infants after Inguinal HerniorrhaphyAnesthesiology, 1995
- Life-threatening Apnea in Infants Recovering from AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1983
- Preterm Infants are More Prone to Complications Following Minor Surgery than are Term InfantsAnesthesiology, 1982