Anal Manometry: A Comparison of Techniques
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 49 (7), 1033-1038
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0549-7
Abstract
Methods of anal manometry vary between centers, resulting in potential difficulties in interpretation of results. This study compared several accepted manometric techniques in healthy control subjects and in patients with fecal incontinence.Eleven patients with fecal incontinence (M:F = 3:8; mean age = 67 years) and ten healthy control subjects (M:F = 3:7; mean age = 64 years) underwent anal manometry using five different methods: 1) water-perfused side hole; 2) water-perfused end hole; 3) microtransducer; 4) microballoon; 5) portable Peritron. Using a station pull-through technique, anal pressures (resting, squeeze, and cough pressures) were recorded at 1-cm intervals from rectum to anal verge, as well as radial pressures in four quadrants for Methods 1 and 2.Water perfusion side hole recorded slightly higher maximal resting pressures; however, there were no significant differences between any of the methods. In healthy control subjects, distal maximal squeeze pressures were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than proximally as measured by microtransducer. There were slight (nonsignificant) variations in radial pressures with water perfusion and microtransducer. Peritron values for maximum resting pressure and maximum squeeze pressure were lower than those recorded by water perfusion side hole by a factor of 0.8.There is no significant variation in anal pressure recordings using standard manometry techniques. Variations in radial pressures are slight and not significant in clinical studies. Results obtained with portable nonperfusion systems must be interpreted appropriately.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anorectal physiological testing in AustraliaAnz Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2001
- Transducer manometry and the effect of body position on anal canal pressuresDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1990
- Clinical Indications for Anorectal Function InvestigationsScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1990
- Assessment of microtransducers in anorectal manometryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Anal canal pressure profile: a reappraisal as determined by rapid pullthrough technique.Gut, 1987
- Effect of age, gender, and parity on anal canal pressuresDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1987
- Anal hypertonia in fissures: Cause or effect?British Journal of Surgery, 1986