Skilled Birth Attendants in Mexico: How Does Care During Normal Birth by General Physicians, Obstetric Nurses, and Professional Midwives Compare With World Health Organization Evidence‐Based Practice Guidelines?
- 23 September 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
- Vol. 57 (1), 18-27
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00075.x
Abstract
We evaluated the quality of basic obstetric care provided by Mexican general physicians, obstetric nurses, and professional midwives compared with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for evidence-based practices and national guidelines. Vaginal births were observed in 5 hospitals in 5 states from June 2006 until July 2007. We created 5 indices based on WHO guidelines and national standards for care during normal birth. These indices included 1) favorable practices at admission, 2) favorable practices during labor, birth, and immediately postpartum, 3) harmful or excessively used practices, 4) newborn practices, and 5) obstetric outcomes. We assessed each provider type's performance as high or low compared with the WHO standard and performed bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to assess the association between indices, patient characteristics, and provider type, adjusting for standard errors for intragroup correlation. We observed 876 independently managed vaginal births. Adjusted regression analyses compared with the general physicians standard revealed significant results for favorable care by obstetric nurses on admission (odds ratio [OR] 6.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.08-18.84); for care by professional midwives (OR 21.08; 95% CI, 4.24-104.94) and obstetric nurses (OR 7.88; 95% CI, 2.76-22.52) during labor, birth, and postpartum; and for newborn practices by obstetric nurses (OR 4.14; 95% CI, 1.08-15.90). Professional midwives were least likely to perform harmful/excessively used practices during labor, birth, and the postpartum period (OR 0.06; 95% CI, 0.00-0.35). Professional midwives and obstetric nurses perform equally or better than general physicians when assessed by use or misuse of evidence-based practices. Professional midwives are an underutilized resource in Mexico. If integrated into the mainstream Mexican health system, they may improve the quality of obstetric care.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human resources for maternal health: multi-purpose or specialists?Human Resources for Health, 2008
- Educating Skilled Birth Attendants in Mexico: Do the Curricula Meet International Confederation of Midwives Standards?Reproductive Health Matters, 2007
- Evidence-informed obstetric practice during normal birth in China: trends and influences in four hospitalsBMC Health Services Research, 2006
- Intrapartal care documented in a Swedish maternity unit and considered in relation to World Health Organization recommendations for care in normal birthMidwifery, 2006
- “Good obstetrics” revisited: Too many evidence‐based practices and devices are not usedInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2006
- SKILLED CARE AT BIRTH IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD: PROGRESS TO DATE AND STRATEGIES FOR EXPANDING COVERAGEJournal of Biosocial Science, 2006
- Hospital Practice Versus Evidence‐Based Obstetrics: Categorizing Practices for Normal Birth in an Egyptian Teaching HospitalaBirth, 2005
- The joint WHO/ICM/FIGO statement on skilled attendants at birth.Midwifery, 2005
- A comparison of data obtained from service providers and service users to assess the quality of maternity careMidwifery, 2002
- Evidence-based obstetrics in four hospitals in China: An observational study to explore clinical practice, women's preferences and provider's viewsBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2001