Deficits in cross-race face learning: Insights from eye movements and pupillometry.
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Vol. 35 (5), 1105-1122
- https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016548
Abstract
The own-race bias (ORB) is a well-known finding wherein people are better able to recognize and discriminate own-race faces, relative to cross-race faces. In 2 experiments, participants viewed Asian and Caucasian faces, in preparation for recognition memory tests, while their eye movements and pupil diameters were continuously monitored. In Experiment 1 (with Caucasian participants), systematic differences emerged in both measures as a function of depicted race: While encoding cross-race faces, participants made fewer (and longer) fixations, they preferentially attended to different sets of features, and their pupils were more dilated, all relative to own-race faces. Also, in both measures, a pattern emerged wherein some participants reduced their apparent encoding effort to cross-race faces over trials. In Experiment 2 (with Asian participants), the authors observed the same patterns, although the ORB favored the opposite set of faces. Taken together, the results suggest that the ORB appears during initial perceptual encoding. Relative to own-race face encoding, cross-race encoding requires greater effort, which may reduce vigilance in some participants.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (R01-DC04535-08)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face RecognitionThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1991
- The effect of context on discrimination and bias in recognition memory for pictures and wordsMemory & Cognition, 1990
- Expertise and configural coding in face recognitionBritish Journal of Psychology, 1989
- Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1988
- Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1986
- Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1986
- The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognitionActa Psychologica, 1986
- Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources.Psychological Bulletin, 1982
- Eye Movement Strategies Involved in Face PerceptionPerception, 1977
- Psychological significance of pupillary movements.Psychological Bulletin, 1972