Utility of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for assessment of total and regional body composition varies between men and women
- 1 July 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Nutrition Research
- Vol. 32 (7), 479-485
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2012.05.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changes in body composition during weight loss in obese subjects in the NUGENOB study: Comparison of bioelectrical impedance vs. dual-energy X-ray absorptiometryDiabetes & Metabolism, 2011
- Volaemic assessment of the elderly hyponatraemic patient: reliability of clinical assessment and validation of bioelectrical impedance analysisQJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Comparison of Body Composition by Bioelectrical Impedance and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Overweight/Obese Postmenopausal WomenJournal of Clinical Densitometry, 2009
- Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in clinical practice: implications for prognosis in stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancerBMC Cancer, 2009
- Validity and reliability of body composition analysers in children and adultsBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2008
- Bioelectrical impedance phase angle as a prognostic indicator in breast cancerBMC Cancer, 2008
- New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole-body analysisEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2004
- Body composition: whatʼs new?Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, 2002
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- DENSITOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF BODY COMPOSITION: REVISION OF SOME QUANTITATIVE ASSUMPTIONS*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1963