DIRECT trial. Diverticulitis recurrences or continuing symptoms: Operative versus conservative Treatment. A MULTICENTER RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL
Open Access
- 6 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Surgery
- Vol. 10 (1), 25
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-10-25
Abstract
Background: Persisting abdominal complaints are common after an episode of diverticulitis treated conservatively. Furthermore, some patients develop frequent recurrences. These two groups of patients suffer greatly from their disease, as shown by impaired health related quality of life and increased costs due to multiple specialist consultations, pain medication and productivity losses. Both conservative and operative management of patients with persisting abdominal complaints after an episode of diverticulitis and/or frequently recurring diverticulitis are applied. However, direct comparison by a randomised controlled trial is necessary to determine which is superior in relieving symptoms, optimising health related quality of life, minimising costs and preventing diverticulitis recurrences against acceptable morbidity and mortality associated with surgery or the occurrence of a complicated recurrence after conservative management. We, therefore, constructed a randomised clinical trial comparing these two treatment strategies. Methods/design: The DIRECT trial is a multicenter randomised clinical trial. Patients (18-75 years) presenting themselves with persisting abdominal complaints after an episode of diverticulitis and/or three or more recurrences within 2 years will be included and randomised. Patients randomised for conservative treatment are treated according to the current daily practice (antibiotics, analgetics and/or expectant management). Patients randomised for elective resection will undergo an elective resection of the affected colon segment. Preferably, a laparoscopic approach is used. The primary outcome is health related quality of life measured by the Gastro-intestinal Quality of Life Index, Short-Form 36, EQ-5D and a visual analogue scale for pain quantification. Secondary endpoints are morbidity, mortality and total costs. The total follow-up will be three years. Discussion: Considering the high incidence and the multicenter design of this study, it may be assumed that the number of patients needed for this study (n = 214), may be gathered within one and a half year. Depending on the expertise and available equipment, we prefer to perform a laparoscopic resection on patients randomised for elective surgery. Should this be impossible, an open technique may be used as this also reflects the current situation.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospective Evaluation of Functional Outcome After Laparoscopic Sigmoid ColectomyAnnals of Surgery, 2009
- Acute laparoscopic intervention for diverticular disease (AIDD): a feasible approachLangenbecks Archives Of Surgery, 2008
- Comparative cost-effectiveness of antiviral therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review of economic evidenceJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2007
- Outcomes after medical and surgical treatment of diverticulitis: A systematic review of the available evidenceJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2007
- Long‐term outcome in 445 patients after diagnosis of diverticular diseaseColorectal Disease, 2007
- Risk of Emergency Colectomy and Colostomy in Patients With Diverticular DiseaseArchives of Surgery, 2005
- Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of LifeMedical Care, 2003
- Diagnosis and treatment of diverticular diseaseSurgical Endoscopy, 1999