Are predicted protein structures of any value for binding site prediction and virtual ligand screening?
- 30 April 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Current Opinion in Structural Biology
- Vol. 23 (2), 191-197
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2013.01.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Template‐based protein structure modeling using TASSERVMTProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2011
- BSP‐SLIM: A blind low‐resolution ligand‐protein docking approach using predicted protein structuresProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2011
- Automated protein structure modeling in CASP9 by I‐TASSER pipeline combined with QUARK‐based ab initio folding and FG‐MD‐based structure refinementProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2011
- FINDSITE‐metal: Integrating evolutionary information and machine learning for structure‐based metal‐binding site prediction at the proteome levelProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2010
- Q‐DockLHM: Low‐resolution refinement for ligand comparative modelingJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2009
- Comparison of structure-based and threading-based approaches to protein functional annotationProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2009
- AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreadingJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2009
- Q‐Dock: Low‐resolution flexible ligand docking with pocket‐specific threading restraintsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2008
- Assessment of programs for ligand binding affinity predictionJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2008
- ROSETTALIGAND: Protein–small molecule docking with full side‐chain flexibilityProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2006