Equivalence Tests
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 5 May 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Social Psychological and Personality Science
- Vol. 8 (4), 355-362
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
Abstract
Scientists should be able to provide support for the absence of a meaningful effect. Currently, researchers often incorrectly conclude an effect is absent based a nonsignificant result. A widely recommended approach within a frequentist framework is to test for equivalence. In equivalence tests, such as the two one-sided tests (TOST) procedure discussed in this article, an upper and lower equivalence bound is specified based on the smallest effect size of interest. The TOST procedure can be used to statistically reject the presence of effects large enough to be considered worthwhile. This practical primer with accompanying spreadsheet and R package enables psychologists to easily perform equivalence tests (and power analyses) by setting equivalence bounds based on standardized effect sizes and provides recommendations to prespecify equivalence bounds. Extending your statistical tool kit with equivalence tests is an easy way to improve your statistical and theoretical inferences.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing Equivalence in Communication Research: Theory and ApplicationCommunication Methods and Measures, 2012
- Equivalence tests – A reviewFood Quality and Preference, 2012
- Confidence IntervalsZeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 2009
- Sample Size Planning for Statistical Power and Accuracy in Parameter EstimationAnnual Review of Psychology, 2008
- Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2006
- Sample sizes for clinical trials with Normal dataStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- A NOTE ON SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION FOR MEAN COMPARISONS BASED ON NONCENTRAL t-STATISTICSJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 2002
- Colloquium on Effect Sizes: the Roles of Editors, Textbook Authors, and the Publication ManualEducational and Psychological Measurement, 2001
- A comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailabilityJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1987
- A new statistical procedure for testing equivalence in two-group comparative bioavailability trialsJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1984