Coping and wellbeing in bereavement: two core outcomes for evaluating bereavement support in palliative care
Open Access
- 12 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Palliative Care
- Vol. 19 (1), 1-15
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0532-4
Abstract
Bereavement support is a core part of palliative care. However, the evidence base is limited by a lack of consistency in the outcomes used to evaluate services and models of support, which makes it difficult to compare approaches. Core Outcome Sets (COS) represent the minimum that should be measured in research into specific conditions or services. The aim of this study was to use a stakeholders’ perspective to develop a COS for evaluating bereavement support for adults in adult palliative care settings. A list of outcomes relevant to bereavement support was created following a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative literature. At an expert workshop 21 stakeholders discussed their views on the most important outcomes and compared these to and critiqued the lists constructed from the review. These lists and discussions informed a two round international DELPHI survey (n = 240) designed to reach consensus on which outcomes/outcome dimensions should be included in the COS. To prioritise and validate the items emerging from the survey, participants at a subsequent consensus day ranked the relative importance of these items (n = 23). A final feedback exercise with these consensus day participants was conducted to confirm the selection of outcomes and dimensions. ‘Ability to cope with grief’ and ‘Quality of life and mental wellbeing’ were selected as two core outcomes. Twenty-one different dimensions to explore when assessing these outcomes were also identified. The coping related dimensions have been categorised as: Negative and overwhelming grief; Communication and connectedness; Understanding, accepting and finding meaning in grief; Finding balance between grief and life going forwards; Accessing appropriate support. Those relating to quality of life and wellbeing have been categorised as; Participation in work and/or regular activities; Relationships and social functioning; Positive mental wellbeing and Negative mental and emotional state. This COS outlines a more consistent way forward for bereavement researchers and practitioners, whilst also orientating towards public health and resilience-based approaches to bereavement care. Further work is planned to identify and develop measures which are specific to this core outcome set, and which will facilitate the future comparability of bereavement services and interventions.Keywords
Funding Information
- Marie Curie (C55837/A20999)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating complex interventions in End of Life Care: the MORECare Statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviewsBMC Medicine, 2013
- Guidelines for the Psychosocial and Bereavement Support of Family Caregivers of Palliative Care PatientsJournal of Palliative Medicine, 2012
- A public health approach to bereavement support services in palliative careAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2012
- Complicated grief and need for professional support in family caregivers of cancer patients in palliative care: a longitudinal cohort studySupportive Care in Cancer, 2011
- The Multicultural Quality of Life Index: presentation and validationJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2011
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2008
- Health outcomes of bereavementThe Lancet, 2007
- The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validationHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2007
- Toward the Development of an Inventory of Daily Widowed Life (IDWL): Guided by the Dual Process Model of Coping with BereavementDeath Studies, 2007
- The Delphi method and health researchHealth Education, 2003