The temperature response of C3and C4photosynthesis
Top Cited Papers
- 15 June 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Plant, Cell & Environment
- Vol. 30 (9), 1086-1106
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01682.x
Abstract
We review the current understanding of the temperature responses of C3 and C4 photosynthesis across thermal ranges that do not harm the photosynthetic apparatus. In C3 species, photosynthesis is classically considered to be limited by the capacities of ribulose 1·5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), ribulose bisphosphate (RuBP) regeneration or Pi regeneration. Using both theoretical and empirical evidence, we describe the temperature response of instantaneous net CO2 assimilation rate (A) in terms of these limitations, and evaluate possible limitations on A at elevated temperatures arising from heat‐induced lability of Rubisco activase. In C3 plants, Rubisco capacity is the predominant limitation on A across a wide range of temperatures at low CO2 (µbar), while at elevated CO2, the limitation shifts to Pi regeneration capacity at suboptimal temperatures, and either electron transport capacity or Rubisco activase capacity at supraoptimal temperatures. In C4 plants, Rubisco capacity limits A below 20 °C in chilling‐tolerant species, but the control over A at elevated temperature remains uncertain. Acclimation of C3 photosynthesis to suboptimal growth temperature is commonly associated with a disproportional enhancement of the Pi regeneration capacity. Above the thermal optimum, acclimation of A to increasing growth temperature is associated with increased electron transport capacity and/or greater heat stability of Rubisco activase. In many C4 species from warm habitats, acclimation to cooler growth conditions increases levels of Rubisco and C4 cycle enzymes which then enhance A below the thermal optimum. By contrast, few C4 species adapted to cooler habitats increase Rubisco content during acclimation to reduced growth temperature; as a result, A changes little at suboptimal temperatures. Global change is likely to cause a widespread shift in patterns of photosynthetic limitation in higher plants. Limitations in electron transport and Rubisco activase capacity should be more common in the warmer, high CO2 conditions expected by the end of the century.Keywords
This publication has 172 references indexed in Scilit:
- C 4 grasses in boreal fens: their occurrence in relation to microsite characteristicsOecologia, 2003
- In vivo temperature response functions of parameters required to model RuBP‐limited photosynthesisPlant, Cell & Environment, 2003
- Photosynthetic down‐regulation in Larrea tridentata exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2: interaction with drought under glasshouse and field (FACE) exposurePlant, Cell & Environment, 1998
- Interactive effects of low atmospheric CO2 and elevated temperature on growth, photosynthesis and respiration in Phaseolus vulgarisPlant, Cell & Environment, 1998
- Enhanced tolerance to bacterial pathogens caused by the transgenic expression of barley lipid transfer protein LTP2The Plant Journal, 1997
- Is the primary cause of thermal inactivation of oxygen evolution in spinach PS II membranes release of the extrinsic 33 kDa protein or of Mn?Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, 1994
- Long-term chilling of young tomato plants under low lightPlanta, 1994
- Low‐temperature‐induced alterations in photosynthetic membranesCritical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 1988
- The temperature‐sensitivity of dark‐inactivation and light‐activation of the ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate car☐ylase in spinach chloroplastsFEBS Letters, 1981
- A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 speciesPlanta, 1980