Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: Differences in the imaging and histopathological features
- 31 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Clinical Radiology
- Vol. 68 (1), e27-e35
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2012.09.003
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screening-Detected and Symptomatic Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Differences in the Sonographic and Pathologic FeaturesAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2008
- US of Ductal Carcinoma In SituRadioGraphics, 2002
- Sonographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with ultrasonographically guided large core needle biopsy: correlation with mammographic and pathologic findings.Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2000
- THE SWEDISH TWO-COUNTY TRIAL TWENTY YEARS LATERRadiologic Clinics of North America, 2000
- Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and pathologic findings.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1994
- Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features with pathologic correlation.Radiology, 1994
- Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances.Radiology, 1989
- Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation.Radiology, 1989
- Circumscribed intraductal carcinoma of the breast.Radiology, 1989
- Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (Intraductal Carcinoma) of the BreastNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988