Patient experience of COPD care: outcomes from the British Lung Foundation Patient Passport
Open Access
- 31 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Open Respiratory Research
- Vol. 6 (1), e000478
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000478
Abstract
Introduction The British Lung Foundation (BLF) COPD Patient Passport (www.blf.org.uk/passport) was developed as a resource to help people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and clinicians to consider the care received and identify essential omissions. We used the online data collected to evaluate the delivery of COPD care in the UK from a patient perspective. Methods The patient passport consists of 13 questions relating to key aspects of COPD care including: spirometry confirmation of diagnosis, understanding their diagnosis, support and a written management plan, vaccinations, smoking cessation, physical activity, exercise, eating well, pulmonary rehabilitation, exacerbations, medications and yearly reviews. Data were presented as proportions with an answer corresponding to good care, and plotted over time to identify trends. Results After removing identifiable duplicates, data from 41 769 entries, completed online between November 2014 and April 2019, remained (table 1). Twenty-four per cent reported getting support to manage their care and a written action plan; 53% could spot the signs of an acute exacerbation; 34% had discussed pulmonary rehabilitation and 41% stated they understood their COPD, and their doctor or nurse had explained where to find information, advice and emotional support. A quarter reported not receiving influenza vaccination and a third of those who smoke were not offered support to quit smoking. Even the strongest areas including spirometry-confirmed diagnosis, and knowing the importance of being active and eating well, achieved only around 80%. Response patterns remained stable or worsened over time. Discussion Responses to the BLF COPD Patient Passport identify substantial gaps in patients' experience of care, which did not appear to improve during the 5 years covered. These data provide a unique yet commonly overlooked perspective on care quality, and highlight that new approaches will be needed to meet the ambitions to improve respiratory care set out in the NHS Long Term Plan.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute for Health Research (Academic Clinical Fellowship)
- Imperial College London (Imperial College Clinician Scientist Scholarship ()
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development and first validation of a patient-reported experience measure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (PREM-C9)Thorax, 2019
- Patterns of breathlessness and associated consulting behaviour: results of an online surveyThorax, 2019
- Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Exacerbation Number and Severity in People With COPDChest, 2017
- Austerity and health: the impact in the UK and EuropeEuropean Journal of Public Health, 2017
- The PROactive instruments to measure physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2015
- Emphysema: time to say farewell to therapeutic nihilismThorax, 2014
- Surgical approaches for lung volume reduction in emphysemaClinical Medicine, 2014
- Finding the missing millions – the impact of a locally enhanced service for COPD on current and projected rates of diagnosis: a population-based prevalence study using interrupted time series analysisPrimary Care Respiratory Journal, 2013
- Breathlessness and Skeletal Muscle Weakness in Patients Undergoing Lung Health Screening in Primary CareCOPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2012
- Designing and implementing a COPD discharge care bundleThorax, 2011