Reliability and Validity of Bookmark-Based Methods for Standard Setting: Comparisons to Angoff-Based Methods in the National Assessment of Educational Progress
- 20 June 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice
- Vol. 30 (2), 3-14
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00200.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating the Bookmark Judgments of Standard-Setting PanelistsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 2011
- Adopting Cut Scores: Post‐Standard‐Setting Panel Considerations for Decision MakersEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2010
- Interpreting the Results of Three Different Standard‐Setting ProceduresEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2003
- A Comparison of Angoff and Bookmark Standard Setting MethodsJournal of Educational Measurement, 2002
- Setting Performance Standards on Complex Educational AssessmentsApplied Psychological Measurement, 2000
- A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING MINIMUM STANDARDS ON THE NATIONAL TEACHER EXAMINATIONSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1984
- Minimum Competency Standards Set by Three Divergent Groups of Raters Using Three Judgmental Procedures: Implications for ValidityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
- Angoff and Nedelsky Standard Setting Procedures: Implications for the Validity of Proficiency Test Score InterpretationEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
- A Comparison of the Nedelsky and Angoff Cutting Score Procedures Using Generalizability TheoryApplied Psychological Measurement, 1980
- STANDARDS AND CRITERIAJournal of Educational Measurement, 1978