The Impact of Opening a Medical Step-Down Unit on Medically Critically Ill Patient Outcomes and Throughput: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
- 18 March 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 35 (5), 425-437
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066618761810
Abstract
To understand the impact of adding a medical step-down unit (SDU) on patient outcomes and throughput in a medical intensive care unit (ICU). Retrospective cohort study. Two academic tertiary care hospitals within the same health-care system. Adults admitted to the medical ICU at either the control or intervention hospital from October 2013 to March 2014 (preintervention) and October 2014 to March 2015 (postintervention). Opening a 4-bed medical SDU at the intervention hospital on April 1, 2014. Using standard summary statistics, we compared patients across hospitals. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we quantified the association of opening an SDU and outcomes (hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay [LOS], and time to transfer to the ICU) after adjustment for secular trends in patient case-mix and patient-level covariates which might impact outcome. We analyzed 500 (245 pre- and 255 postintervention) patients in the intervention hospital and 678 (323 pre- and 355 postintervention) in the control hospital. Patients at the control hospital were younger (60.5-60.6 vs 64.0-65.4 years, P < .001) with a higher severity of acute illness at the time of evaluation for ICU admission (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score: 4.9-4.0 vs 3.9-3.9, P < .001). Using the difference-in-differences methodology, we identified no association of hospital mortality (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.81 [0.42 to 1.55], P = .52) or hospital LOS (% change [95% confidence interval]: −8.7% [−28.6% to 11.2%], P = .39) with admission to the intervention hospital after SDU opening. The ICU LOS overall was not associated with admission to the intervention hospital in the postintervention period (−23.7% [−47.9% to 0.5%], P = .06); ICU LOS among survivors was significantly reduced (−27.5% [−50.5% to −4.6%], P = .019). Time to transfer to ICU was also significantly reduced (−26.7% [−44.7% to −8.8%], P = .004). Opening our medical SDU improved medical ICU throughput but did not affect more patient-centered outcomes of hospital mortality and LOS.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01 HL 122998)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rising Billing for Intermediate Intensive Care among Hospitalized Medicare Beneficiaries between 1996 and 2010American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2016
- Does intermediate care improve patient outcomes or reduce costs?Critical Care, 2015
- The Impact of Hospital and ICU Organizational Factors on Outcome in Critically Ill PatientsCritical Care Medicine, 2015
- The Role of Stepdown Beds in Hospital CareAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014
- Hospital mortality of adults admitted to Intensive Care Units in hospitals with and without Intermediate Care Units: a multicentre European cohort studyCritical Care, 2014
- Introducing an integrated intermediate care unit improves ICU utilization: a prospective intervention studyBMC Anesthesiology, 2014
- The effects of discharge to an intermediate care unit after a critical illness: A 5-year cohort studyJournal of Critical Care, 2014
- Influence of the Admission Pattern on the Outcome of Patients Admitted to a Respiratory Intensive Care Unit: Does a Step-Down Admission Differ From a Step-Up One?Respiratory Care, 2013
- Intensive care unit readmissions in U.S. hospitalsCritical Care Medicine, 2012
- Closure of an Intermediate Care UnitChest, 1993