Judgements of quality, listening, and understanding based upon vocal activity
- 1 March 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Southern Speech Communication Journal
- Vol. 41 (2), 189-197
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10417947609372307
Abstract
A large amount of research has indicated that vocal activity, or how much an individual talks, is a major, and often ignored variable in interpersonal interactions. In the past, vocal activity has been related strongly to rankings of leadership, influence, and liking. The present study sought to examine the relationships between vocal activity and three other, less often examined variables: the attribution of quality contributions, perceived listening, and perceived understanding. Correlational analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between activity and attribution of quality contributions. Significant negative relationships were observed between vocal activity and perceived listening and understanding.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factor Analysis of Small Group Leadership BehaviorThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1973
- Effect of interaction rate on ratings of leadership and liking.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973
- Interpersonal Judgments Based on Talkativeness: I Fact or Artifact?Sociometry, 1972
- Latency of Verbal Response and Participation in Small GroupsSociometry, 1972
- Changes in interpersonal descriptions accompanying the operant conditioning of verbal frequency in groupsJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1965
- Experiments on the alteration of group structureJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1965
- The Effect of Talkativeness on Ability to Influence Group Solutions of ProblemsSociometry, 1958
- The behavior of leaders and other group members.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1951
- Situational Tests: II. Leaderless Group Discussion VariablesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1951
- An analysis of the leaderless group discussion.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1949