Sleep, Wake and Phase Dependent Changes in Neurobehavioral Function under Forced Desynchrony
Open Access
- 1 July 2011
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Sleep
- Vol. 34 (7), 931-941
- https://doi.org/10.5665/SLEEP.1130
Abstract
The homeostatic-circadian regulation of neurobehavioral functioning is not well understood in that the role of sleep dose in relation to prior wake and circadian phase remains largely unexplored. The aim of the present study was to examine the neurobehavioral impact of sleep dose at different combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. A between-participant design involving 2 forced desynchrony protocols varying in sleep dose. Both protocols comprised 7 repetitions of a 28-h sleep/wake cycle. The sleep dose in a standard protocol was 9.33 h per 28-h day and 4.67 h in a sleep-restricted protocol. A time-isolation laboratory at the Centre for Sleep Research, the University of South Australia. A total of 27 young healthy males participated in the study with 13 in the standard protocol (age 22.5 ± 2.2 y) and 14 in the sleep-restricted protocol (age 21.8 ± 3.8 y). Wake periods during both protocols were approximately 4 h delayed each 28-h day relative to the circadian system, allowing performance testing at different combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. The manipulation in sleep dose between the 2 protocols, therefore, allowed the impact of sleep dose on neurobehavioral performance to be examined at various combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. Neurobehavioral function was assessed using the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT). There was a sleep dose × circadian phase interaction effect on PVT performance such that sleep restriction resulted in slower and more variable response times, predominantly during the biological night. This interaction was not altered by prior wakefulness, as indicated by a nonsignificant sleep dose × circadian phase × prior wake interaction. The performance consequence of sleep restriction in our study was prominent during the biological night, even when the prior wake duration was short, and this performance consequence was in forms of waking state instability. This result is likely due to acute homeostatic sleep pressure remaining high despite the sleep episode.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamics of Neurobehavioral Performance Variability Under Forced Desynchrony: Evidence of State InstabilitySleep, 2011
- The effects of different roster schedules on sleep in minersApplied Ergonomics, 2010
- Circadian and Wake-Dependent Influences on Subjective Sleepiness, Cognitive Throughput, and Reaction Time Performance in Older and Young AdultsSleep, 2010
- Can a Shorter Psychomotor Vigilance Task Be Usedas a Reasonable Substitute for the Ten‐Minute Psychomotor Vigilance Task?Chronobiology International, 2006
- A COMPARISON OF SOME DIFFERENT METHODS FOR PURIFYING CORE TEMPERATURE DATA FROM HUMANSChronobiology International, 2000
- Circadian temperature and melatonin rhythms, sleep, and neurobehavioral function in humans living on a 20-h dayAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 1999
- Stability, Precision, and Near-24-Hour Period of the Human Circadian PacemakerScience, 1999
- Industrial shift systemsApplied Ergonomics, 1998
- Cumulative Sleepiness, Mood Disturbance, and Psychomotor Vigilance Performance Decrements During a Week of Sleep Restricted to 4–5 Hours per NightSleep, 1997
- A two process model of sleep regulation.1982